Let me ask this:

Why is it when [URL=http://www.gamepolitics.com/2008/07/21/renewed-controversy-over-iraqi-artist039s-virtual-jihadi-game]Wafaa Bilal made his Virtual Jihad game[/URL] about recruiting a suicide bomber to kil George Bush, the majority of gamers came to his defence, but when [URL=http://www.gamepolitics.com/2008/08/22/leipzig-con-artist039s-mashup-911-and-space-invaders-creates-controversy]Douglas Edric Stanley made his game[/URL] about the futility of our current counter terrorism strategy, the majority of gamers attacked him?

What was the difference? Both were discussing almost the same thing. Both were part of art exhibits. Both were games. What was the difference? Why did one band us together in its defense while the other was collectively despised?

I would like to understand this better.