and list can go on and on. This game has so many tiny and big flaws in it, and I am totally not counting notorious bugs and FPS issues - if I realized these problems during that last Beta I joined, I wouldn't have wasted time and money on this game, any time sooner than six months into its launch.
Actually never had to deal with their Customer services. And I already stated that I am pro-sub. Plus a product should always be weighed as a whole, not just by one cool side of it. As a gaming software, ESO is a partially (60+ percent partially) failed project.
Hell yea, i would do it a million times over. Why the action. When have u ever been able to do that roll in an mmo? Never.. This game is going to be the game. We all see it but they ran out of money. It is cool I am here to get them on track 15 dollars at a time. To think this game cannot be Elder Scrolls Online Gold you are fooling yourself. When I can block with my shield and have live action u best believe I will sponsor. If u ever played an elder scroll u know they have a line up still to come. WoW I played for 9 1/2 years I tell you this one has it. Ppl or reviews talk $&@! But do you not see a great game in the making. Drog signing off. No more comment on this subject.
Actually Tera Onlines Combat system is where ZOS got the idea from. TERA Online was the first MMORPG to have a "True Action "Targetless" Combat system, and it still trumps ESO by a mile (In more then one area). Tera Online is unfortunately even as an F2P game a much higher quality and more professionally designed MMORPG, then ESO in it's current state.
On MMORPGs worth playing (Based on Features alone) you have the following list (Going to keep this to fantasy MMORPGs):
1. Tera Online - Everything ESO should be, without the Lore and "Unique" Class system. Probably the most successful F2P MMORPG game as well, with the best F2P system.
2. ESO - Because it's new still and I am giving the devs the Benefit of the doubt that they will fix it and change it into an actual TES game. ESO "can" be the best. If the Studio would simply stop trying to do their own, and actually make it a TES game.
I definitely would. I would not, however, be so quick with the Imperial edition. To echo others here, 1-50 is great. VR content is empty and boring (despite the fact that I'm soloing most VR public dungeon bosses with little trouble). Quite frankly, I'm only playing it for the skillpoints\story.
Had lots of fun times in this game. It's broken now, and I just unsubbed, but I am not giving up my hopes. AoC turned out absolutely great once it overcame it's initial problems, and just like that game this one seems to be a case of Premature Release. If Funcom could make AoC playable in less than a year, then ZOS should be able to get ESO up and running in just a few months.
To me the game from VR on is great, but could need a bit more variety at VR 12 (more open world quests, like in the VR zones 1-10, hard challenges and especially a housing system).
I don't raid, so seeing that no non raid content has been added is a bit of a "uhm" feeling for me due the experience with Cheap ESO Gold other MMO´s that also promised the world and then turned the dungeon grinder mode on with nothing new but dungeons and raids.
From 1-50 the game is a bit too easy I think, its hard to group as nobody needs anyone except for the events - this is a big issue in MMO´s for me. I want to meet and play with others, else I would play a singleplayer game. The VR´s offered all this, but this might be history now due the vocal minority here :(
The lack of multi thread support is also unquestionable one of the biggest issue´s still three months in the game, so you have to wonder will it ever be fixed?
In general the idea´s, the design of the game are still great and we will see what happens today with the nerf and future content. Right now I would probably still buy it as I am a very optimistic person, but the bad feeling in my tommy still persists due things that were announced in the past days :(
