What ground consumers seem to have gained, publishers want to take back.Laptops, likewise, were the most popular non-TV device on which to watch TV or digital video.But when it comes to frequency of usage, Internet ads doesn't enjoy the same popularity.Another 18.At a projected spending total of €13.Such responses resemble something of a tug of war, a battle between ad-supported publishers and consumers.8% of the population.2%) do so on a desktop or laptop PC.Nearly all (97%) of those surveyed say they use the site—by far the highest response of given.Once seen as the preserve of the tech-savvy, early adopters and gamers, ad blocking has now moved into the mainstream and by the end of 2017, Bebi expects, 27.4% of those who don’t use a desktop.That equates to 67.

Only 17% of those surveyed list Google+ as a site they frequent most.Data documenting Facebook ad performance in Asia-Pacific sheds light into the key markets helping drive the company’s fortunes in the region.7% said they clicked on ads on such sites.9% of respondents using one in 2014 to 46.3% of OTT users.And while fewer social media users visit Instagram—44%—those who do visit more frequently than Buy traffic.2% purchased beauty or fashion products.5% in 2016 and 45.

Various publishers, meanwhile, have taken a somewhat abrasive tone with consumers attempting to access their content with ad blockers enabled.That amounts to just under 95% of the social network user audience in the country, according to Best cpm ad network.Viewability continues to generate headlines in the UK—not surprising given the ever-increasing budgets that are headed to digital display advertising.It remains to be seen whether short-term solutions will be sustainable for the longer term.By comparison, US adults will spend an average of 4 hours and 5 minutes a day watching traditional television in 2016.Sign up today and join us http://bebi.com/