The Duke Journal of Constitutional Law and Public Policy offers an exhaustive analysis of Schwarzenegger v. Entertainment Merchants Association in an article called "[URL=http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/djclpp/index.php?action=showitem&id=195][B]The More Things Change, The More They Stay The Same: Schwarzenegger v. Entertainment Merchants Association[/B][/URL]."

Beatrice M. Hahn dissects every aspect of the case - from the positions of both sides and the lack of data supporting the state's case, to free speech issues and the definition of obscenity. While the lengthy review of the case is interesting, readers will be more fascinated with the conclusions: the Supreme Court will probably rule against California's 2005 video game law.

From the last three paragraphs of the article: [URL=http://www.gamepolitics.com/2011/02/10/duke-journal-analysis-schwarzenegger-vema][B][COLOR=#8e0505]Read More[/COLOR][/B][/URL]

[URL=http://www.gamepolitics.com/2011/02/10/duke-journal-analysis-schwarzenegger-vema]read more[/URL]

[url=http://www.gamepolitics.com/2011/02/10/duke-journal-analysis-schwarzenegger-vema]More...[/url]