Senator Al Franken (D-MN) does not like the new net neutrality proposal and has said publically that it could do "more harm than doing nothing at all." Franken says this for a number of reasons: it exempts wireless broadband from any nondiscrimination provisions, it gives a nod of approval to paid prioritization. In his view, the FCC would be better off waiting and doing net neutrality the right way.

Franken is not alone in his criticism; Republicans don't want any form of net neutrality, while Democrats -- including advocacy groups such as Free Press and the ECA - don't like it because it doesn't do enough.

"I am very worried that the draft Order does not do enough to preserve that openness," he wrote to FCC Chair Julius Genachowski. In fact, as presently written, it could do "more harm than doing nothing at all." [URL=http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/12/17/senator-franken-and-net-neutrality-nothing-all-might-be-better][B][COLOR=#8e0505]Read More[/COLOR][/B][/URL]

[URL=http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/12/17/senator-franken-and-net-neutrality-nothing-all-might-be-better]read more[/URL]

[url=http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/12/17/senator-franken-and-net-neutrality-nothing-all-might-be-better]More...[/url]