Over the past month, the “pro-family” [URL=http://www.eagleforum.org/]Eagle Forum[/URL] [URL=http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/08/25/pro-family-groups-trying-sway-utah-ag%E2%80%99s-schwarzenegger-stance]attempted [/URL]([URL=http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/09/22/op-ed-praises-utah-ag%E2%80%99s-supreme-decision]and failed[/URL]) to lobby Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff into supporting the California side of Schwarzenegger v. EMA, while its founder, Phyllis Schlafly, [URL=http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/09/09/eagle-forum-founder-blast-videogames]scribbled out a withering column[/URL] on the “evil products” and “highly disturbing” content emerging from the videogame industry. Now another Eagle Forum member is attempting to pin the group’s anti-videogame stance on protecting children.
[URL=http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/09/27/another-eagle-forum-member-makes-case-against-violent-games][B][COLOR=#8e0505]Read More[/COLOR][/B][/URL][URL=http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/09/27/another-eagle-forum-member-makes-case-against-violent-games]read more[/URL]

[url=http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/09/27/another-eagle-forum-member-makes-case-against-violent-games]More...[/url]