As a court case in the District of Columbia court against 14,000 "john doe" defendants filed by the US Copyright Group over file sharing movies continues, increasingly defendants and ISPs are saying that the court has no jurisdiction over them.

One John Doe defendant in the D.C. case sent a letter to the court saying that he has never traded files, nor lived, used an ISP, or worked in the D.C case and that he adding him as a defendant is improper because has nothing in common with the "co-defendants." Here's what he wrote to the court: [URL=http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/08/30/defendants-isps-dc-court-doesn%E2%80%99t-have-jurisdiction-p2p-john-doe-case][B][COLOR=#8e0505]Read More[/COLOR][/B][/URL]

[URL=http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/08/30/defendants-isps-dc-court-doesn%E2%80%99t-have-jurisdiction-p2p-john-doe-case]read more[/URL]

[url=http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/08/30/defendants-isps-dc-court-doesn%E2%80%99t-have-jurisdiction-p2p-john-doe-case]More...[/url]