As each side in the Schwarzenegger v. EMA case attempts to lure state attorney generals to sign on to their respective amicus briefs, [URL=http://www.commonsensemedia.org/]Commons Sense Media [/URL]Chief James Steyer is turning up the pressure on one particular person.

The [URL=http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2010/08/california-violent-video-game-bill-supreme-court-common-sense-media.html]LA Times features[/URL] an excerpt from a letter by Steyer to Utah Attorney General, and [URL=http://www.gamepolitics.com/2009/03/30/jack-thompson-threatens-quotproceedquot-against-utah-attorney-general]a one-time target[/URL] of a certain disbarred attorney, Mark Shurtleff (pictured). While Shurtleff might seem like a natural to sign on to a brief in favor of overturning the California law—[URL=http://attorneygeneral.utah.gov/384.html]he argued for a ban of the game 25 to Life in 2005[/URL]—he has also demonstrated considerable backbone, once challenging a proposed Utah law introduced by a now disbarred attorney as unconstitutional.
[URL=http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/08/19/utah-might-be-game-industry-side-schwarzenegger-case][B][COLOR=#8e0505]Read More[/COLOR][/B][/URL][URL=http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/08/19/utah-might-be-game-industry-side-schwarzenegger-case]read more[/URL]

[url=http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/08/19/utah-might-be-game-industry-side-schwarzenegger-case]More...[/url]