[B]Zippy rantage 9000(A ton of opinion with a ounce of research)

“Marriage stealers and baby eaters”[/B]

I so love the supposed assault on marriage and the whole “ZOMG THE GAYS ARE COMING TO STEAL IT FROM YOU!”

Let’s look at history….50-70 years ago inter race and religious mixing was the great evil that would end the world…the whole blunderbuss over the issue and to a lesser extent “gays” themselves is due to the tree up the rear of some of the main religions/moralists of the world…looking at “paganists” they could care less about marrying gays, multiple partners, children or animals so let’s get things into perspective.
=========================================
[B]
The Marriage pact or at least the important half of it.[/B]
Let’s start off on current times and the rule of law and how the government both local and federal, due to governments needs to track and tax people one cannot get married fully without the consent of man which lessens if not removes religions role from main authority over marriage, laws focus on taxing or managing couples, children, families and dispersing wealth to them.
Due to the laws of local governments and the laws of the country one can get fully married without a ceremony before their brand of god’s’ because of this the whole march against gay marriage is nothing but petty moralisim or judgmental Nazism at its best, if we can have rich drug addicts(half of hollywood) or cultists(scientology) as parents and married couples then is no good reason why gays ca no do so…even more so when everyone knows you cannot teach a teen who “like“ in the it’s up to fate or even god if you will.
[B]
History 102 Zippy style.[/B]

Look back 50 or more years and tell me there are no comparisons to the petty moralisims of the day and the hatred for anything different than what was taught. Gays are the jews of yester year to be diminished by the many as much as they can. Personally it’s a no brainer like blacks and women they are human adults (well most of them…adult that is…) there is no reason to hold them back and beat them down to do so only shows how immature you are.
Looking at some of the stated fears of children and animal “”minglings” is nothing short of desperate cries for attention and putrid puritan assault on logic…children cannot be taxed(they take money in a whole different way and if you are lucky can get tax breaks on them) and neither can animals…once long ago children were married off at 10-13 to either be birthing machines or trade this of course is due to women always being lesser than men and the short life spans of the general populace these things of coarse were considered “OK“ as well as polygamy at least of the time period, now let’s look at these “ideas” one at a time.

[B]Animals[/B]
[SIZE=1](Please no exotic animal tax rebuttals :P)[/SIZE]

Really…this is out of the blue…personally if a person can get a license like a luxury tax (yearly vet checkups and what not) to do such things “WTF evera” I say however marriage is pointless because the other is not human and cannot be “taxed” or have “children” thus raising the issues only shows not only how perverted you are and how desperate you are to play on the whims of the mindless masses.

[B] Polygamy[/B]

Here is an interesting query we have adults willing to commune with each other, sire each other’s offspring and live together as a family…one would think this would be an ideal of the world…sadly reality breaks the golden path ever so quickly..that or greed or jealously….

I am looking at this from a tax/legal stand point…you have multiple partners, multiple “interests” and any number of possible outcomes really the sate and fed have enough issues with normal double minded couples so this truly should a “church” and or legal team issue…the government should only worry about taxing the house hold income..
Perhaps loosen the legal stigma on it and tax them more if they have more than 3 or 4 bread winners in the house hold, this of course would not carry over to normal families, and then the government could take some of the money and put it to abused women/children projects across the nation, not that there is a direct collation but with more “legitimate” “marriages“ one will find a increase in both good and bad outcomes.

[B]Children [/B]

And we save the children for last and remember dear readers children are anyone under 18 and kids anyone under 30(gotta love the US eh?), what can I say times have changed we no longer need to have a large populace of teens popping out drones, however the more we change the more we stay the same we still have arranged marriages in varying degrees of questionability, but in all it comes down to the local laws and the parents, I believe we as a maturing society can scrutinize this issue a bit more but I do not see the need to outright ban it, although banning the sex aspect of it …till16/17 sounds good to me. :P

[B]Religion and its place.[/B]

If law is the key to government, religion is the key to the individual; it is after all the individuals choice and right to hold a ceremony of their choosing if they can find a place and can afford it the prepubescent stone throwing over the issue reminds me of kids and a game of rock tag with garbage lid shields and double jeans…we throw them despite the dangers because we do not know any better in hindsight oh how foolish it was and look at the stone throwing of the 50s and 60s my point being it’s not religions fault we are naïve petty humans, we need to see the immaturity in it and let it go, religion nay faith after all is personal, private thing should we hide it no…but claiming in public “the only way”, “all to hell”, is the same as saying “people are stupid”, “we should get rid of them people” “get a job you bum”( to a homeless person) my point ,perspective, respect, humbleness lose sight of these and you lose sight of everything, sorry for rambling my heart aches on this issue to see normally kind people turn into demons over such personal things..

[B]Baby eaters [/B]
[B]A quick rant on Abortion and sex ed…[/B]

For the most part Abortion is done by not the mindless 20 something’s or teens but by women who have already had a child cannot afford another and they are most likely married, to remove the right for a woman to have a Abortion will place not only a strain on a good chuck of the American family but also on its population I see Abortion and sex ed as keys to control population on the whim of the individual. Sex ed is very much like teaching your child about fire arms, just because they know how to load and operate and clean it does not mean they will be shooting anything insight thus why sex ed needs to teach about sex, stds and the horrors of raising a child in poverty..I have lived it and it’s made me not want to “touch” animated objects…er..living..er…human..no that’s worse…ha ha ha..
Anyway… you get the point between teaching about protection first and stds and the horrors there of with abstinence as the intro and outtro of each class one can lower the “damage” being done (teen pregnancy, children in poverty, std reduction) the main reason why this is the correct thinking is about only half of parents bother to teach about sex correctly (either protection or full on fear mongering to scare them into abstinence) the rest do not do a good enough job thus the government needs a full sex ed system that can be easily avoided with a opt out option, while government safety nets are laughable at best the main reason why this is a good idea is because if the parents do not care “abstinence only” classes will not work, more information is better than “dun do it bubye”.

Yes dear readers this is zippy rantage and brainstorming, be afraid be very afraid.[SIZE=1][COLOR=White]

(Disclaimer, side effects from reading this article include, impotence, lack of energy, eyestrain, guy busting, incontinence, incoherence, lowering of the IQ, erectile dysfunction, headaches, confusion, joy, suffering, frustration, madness, envy, and the rare rare side effect to give all your basses/money to zippy , thank you for taking the time to try and read this :P)
[/COLOR][/SIZE]