...On the part of the Administration de Bush.

[URL=http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=3370891]Harriet Myers may face contempt charges...[/URL]

And well she should. Even if she could successfully argue that she doesn't have to testify because of executive privaledge doesn't mean that she just can stay home instead of going to what is essentially a court of law. Another thing is that this woman was Bush's pick to be a Supreme Court Justice, remember?

[URL=http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/07/bush-perhaps-so.html]Bush says "perhaps someone in the administration ousted a CIA operative" but we should just fuggetaboutit.[/URL]

[QUOTE=ABC news]"You know, I've often thought about what would have happened had that person come forth and said, 'I did it.' Would we have had this, you know, endless hours of investigation and a lot of money being spent on this matter?" Bush said.

The President said it has been "a tough issue for a lot of people in the White House, and it's run its course, and now we're going to move on."[/QUOTE]

But if you don't force people to testify to attourneys by just letting them off the hook when they don't help with the investigation how do you expect someone to talk? Just imagine if he had the same opinion on Terror suspects, not only would gitmo be closed but we would have zero intelligence on Al Quida.