[url]http://www.wired.com/news/technology/internet/0,72818-0.html?tw=rss.index[/url]
[quote]An alternative Wikipedia written by conservative Christians has become a major target of mockery on the web.
Conservapedia, a wiki-based encyclopedia that offers the historical record from a conservative perspective, is attracting lots of derisive comments on blogs and a growing number of phony articles written by mischief makers.
Conservapedia "is a gold mine of unintentional hilarity," wrote Mark Frauenfelder on Boing Boing last Monday.
The Wonkette political blog encouraged its readers to contribute to "this fast-growing, Jeebus-and-America-friendly online resource." So did the ScienceBlogs network, which said, "There's much fun to be had."
Even conservative commentators like Andrew Sullivan are bemused.
Conservapedia brands itself on its main page as "a much-needed alternative to Wikipedia, which is increasingly anti-Christian and anti-American."
"The site is intended as a resource for the general audience, but without the defects of Wikipedia," says Conservapedia's project leader, Andy Schlafly, a conservative writer and attorney.[/quote]
Lol! So, Wikipedia is [I]supposedly [/I]anti-American, anti-Christian, and has a liberal bias. So what do they do? Make a wiki that [I]actually [/I]has pro-American, pro-Christian, conservative bias.
[quote][B]Conservapedia, a wiki-based encyclopedia that offers the historical record from a conservative perspective[/B], is attracting lots of derisive comments on blogs and a growing number of phony articles written by mischief makers.[/quote]
So, history from a conservative perspective? So history too has a liberal bias as well, eh?
Check it out here: [url]http://www.conservapedia.com/[/url]
I can't access it now, though. Must be down. Haha.