PDA

View Full Version : Gears of War (questions)


ZippyDSMlee
11-24-2006, 01:10 AM
From the movies I have seen its a 3rd person sci fi/modern war sim.

ggaaaa another 3rd person game trying to be innovative...blah....I wants a fun FPS not a bloated 3rd person FPS wanna be game ><(sorry but rarely are 3rd person games well done...and 3rd person shooters even worse...)

and WTF we get a grenade reticle but not a walking/moving reticle.......WEAK......
I guess if I ever play it i will drag out my Zelda 64 reticle I drew on clear plastic to I could snipe with with it and genrealy hit thigns.....

reload ain't have bad that adds spice to things....but me no like all the crouching/cover stuff ....

SO besides my prepubescent ranting anyone want to give a jaded gamer a personal review?


I also noticed soemthign else....how dose this look on a normal TV is the 3rd person aspect squared ok?

(edit) the lead dev says hes "tired" of having to guess for grenade physics(where the land)...oh poor man who cant take take 10 min to train himself with grenades him has to make a reticle..and build the game around obscure 3rd person rules.....>>

Thefremen
11-24-2006, 02:06 AM
Riiiiiiiiight.


From what I hear, the guns have chainsaws. That's pretty much all I need to know about this game.

ZippyDSMlee
11-24-2006, 02:11 AM
Riiiiiiiiight.


From what I hear, the guns have chainsaws. That's pretty much all I need to know about this game.

Not all guns.....,it looks ok but I doubt the whole 3rd person thing >>

Ministeve
11-24-2006, 04:18 AM
No, don't play the game, you can judge it without doing that.

ZippyDSMlee
11-25-2006, 05:21 AM
No, don't play the game, you can judge it without doing that.

if I did that I could not bitch about it :P

ZippyDSMlee
12-01-2006, 02:41 AM
Got to play it for 20ish min its not bad not great either but not bad and looks great....*punts self for calling the 360 not next gen* :eek:
*L*

and to think they can squzze another 30ish % of of the system over the next 5 years ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo