PDA

View Full Version : Questions to ask 2008 Candidates for House and Senate


ezacharyk
09-30-2008, 12:14 AM
As the Chapter Pres for the Oklahoma City chapter, I am preparing a set of questions to ask the candidates for House and Senate. This is something I think is important and would like to get other member's feedback and support.

Here is the letter as I have it now. Please leave feedback.

My name is Zachary Knight. I am the Chapter President of the Oklahoma City Chapter of the Entertainment Consumer Association (ECA), a nonprofit organization that seeks to protect the rights of video game consumers.

During this election cycle, many of the important topics are covered quite thoroughly by your campaigns and the media. These important topics include things such as the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, health care, the financial crisis and more. These are important topics that will shape the direction this country travels over the next several years.

But amongst all of these, there are also several topics that don't receive the attention that the above get. These other topics are minor issues when faced with such glaringly important issues, but they are still relevant to people in the areas you represent.

We at the ECA look after the rights of video game consumers. Whether these rights are threatened by the industry itself or the government. Keeping with this, we would appreciate if you could take a few moments to respond to some questions regarding topics that directly affect consumers of the digital age.

These questions are as follows:

1.Earlier this year, The House of Representatives introduced HB 5990 and the Senate introduced S 3315. These bills once passed would require all video games distributed in the US to have an ESRB rating and would make the sale or rental of games rated AO or M to minors under the age of 18 or 17, respectively, illegal. In light of the attempts by several state governments' attempts to regulate video games in a similar fashion and their subsequent rulings to be unconstitutional, do you support this legislation? What other ways would you pursue to reach the desired result?
2.Several Internet Service Providers (ISP) have made efforts to limit internet service to those who pay for it. This includes blocking use of services that tend to use a large amount of bandwidth and placing caps on the amount of data that can be transferred over a customers internet connection. Do you support Network Neutrality, keeping all information on the internet equal? How will you help ensure that internet consumer's rights are protected?
3.Since the passing of the DMCA, content providers have lobbied for more restrictions and laws to safe guard their copyrighted materials. The changes they would like to see could directly and negatively effect such consumer rights as First Sale and Fair Use. Would you support limiting the DMCA to avoid infringing on consumer rights? What steps would you take to ensure that both content providers and content consumers are provided the rights they deserve?

Please respond to these questions by sending your answers to me at ezknight.okceca@gmail.com I look forward to receiving your thoughts on these important issues.

Thank you for your time and good luck this election cycle.

ConstantNeophyte
09-30-2008, 12:51 AM
We at the ECA look after the rights of video game consumers. Whether these rights are threatened by the industry itself or the government. Keeping with this, we would appreciate if you could take a few moments to respond to some questions regarding topics that directly affect consumers of the digital age.

That bit strikes me as not gooder england...

As for the questions, they seem solid. :)

GamesLaw
09-30-2008, 01:17 AM
Yeah, should be a comma, not a period and new sentence.

KN
09-30-2008, 08:12 AM
*economy implodes*

*writes letter to congress asking to protect expensive toys*

ezacharyk
09-30-2008, 08:36 AM
*economy implodes*

*writes letter to congress asking to protect expensive toys*

Yes you are right, hence the opening of the letter.

KN
09-30-2008, 08:43 AM
Yes you are right, hence the opening of the letter.

but you suggest that this would be a serious issue that could shape your senate and congressional votes.


America does not have this luxury right now. You must vote as many democrats as humanly possible into office, damning the consequences. Sure, some republicans are really awesome and probably better than their democratic counterparts, but some of the things your next president is going to have to do require full support from both houses. We don't want Lieberman to be the tiebreaker.



Seriously, **** video games for a sec and think strategically.


ps vote against lieberman I don't want to see that ****ing hack ever again

Awol
09-30-2008, 10:21 AM
but you suggest that this would be a serious issue that could shape your senate and congressional votes.


America does not have this luxury right now. You must vote as many democrats as humanly possible into office, damning the consequences. Sure, some republicans are really awesome and probably better than their democratic counterparts, but some of the things your next president is going to have to do require full support from both houses. We don't want Lieberman to be the tiebreaker.



Seriously, **** video games for a sec and think strategically.


Man this is why we have the problems we do in government. Why vote for as many democrats as we can? You should be voting for people you believe in and hold the same views that you hold. Ezacharyk letter is trying to find those views he and his chapter are interested in knowing.

Voting blindly will just get you the same mess of people, even if they are different people. So this November 4th vote for those people you like no matter which party they belong to, and if enough people did this we might actually have a government that gets something done.

KN
09-30-2008, 11:29 AM
Man this is why we have the problems we do in government. Why vote for as many democrats as we can? You should be voting for people you believe in and hold the same views that you hold. Ezacharyk letter is trying to find those views he and his chapter are interested in knowing.

Voting blindly will just get you the same mess of people, even if they are different people. So this November 4th vote for those people you like no matter which party they belong to, and if enough people did this we might actually have a government that gets something done.

the GOP needs to crash and burn so it can reform into a party that doesn't suck. Not voting for them can contribute to this

ezacharyk
09-30-2008, 11:50 AM
but you suggest that this would be a serious issue that could shape your senate and congressional votes.


America does not have this luxury right now. You must vote as many democrats as humanly possible into office, damning the consequences. Sure, some republicans are really awesome and probably better than their democratic counterparts, but some of the things your next president is going to have to do require full support from both houses. We don't want Lieberman to be the tiebreaker.



Seriously, **** video games for a sec and think strategically.


ps vote against lieberman I don't want to see that ****ing hack ever again

So having more information is a bad thing?

Like I said in the letter, these politicians' views on major issues is well documented. But their views on these smaller issues are not.

I think that you can never have enough information when it comes to voting for the people who run this country.

ezacharyk
10-01-2008, 02:09 PM
I just got my letter back from the ECA with a few edits. I like it.

As the Chapter President of the Oklahoma City Chapter of the Entertainment Consumer Association (ECA), a national nonprofit membership organization established to serve the needs of those who play computer and video games, I am reaching out to you on behalf of my members in the district you’re currently running to represent. We would appreciate it if you would take a few moments to respond to a few questions regarding topics that directly affect Oklahoma City consumers of the digital age.

During this election cycle, many important topics are covered quite thoroughly by your campaigns and the media, including the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, health care, the financial crisis and more. But as you know, there are also several “second tier” topics that don't receive the attention that the above get and which they deserve, such as First Amendment rights, network neutrality and ISP access, and Fair Use doctrine and consumer protections. Our questions relate to these topics, as your answers will help us shape our decisions on who to vote for in November:

1.Earlier this year, The House of Representatives introduced HB 5990 and the Senate introduced S 3315. These bills, once passed, would require all video games distributed in the US to have an ESRB rating affixed and would make the sale or rental of games rated AO or M to minors under the age of 18 or 17, respectively, illegal. In light of the attempts by several state governments' attempts to regulate video games in a similar fashion, and their subsequent rulings to be unconstitutional, do you support this legislation? What other ways would you pursue to reach your desired result?

2.Several Internet Service Providers (ISP) have made efforts to limit internet service to those who pay for it. This includes blocking use of services that tend to use a large amount of bandwidth and placing caps on the amount of data that can be transferred over a customers internet connection. This directly interferes with the ability to play video games online. Do you support Network Neutrality, keeping all information on the internet equal? How will you help ensure that internet consumer's rights are protected? What is your stand on universal broadband accessibility?

3.Since the passing of the DMCA, content providers have lobbied for more restrictions and laws to safe guard their copyrighted materials. The changes they would like to see could directly and negatively effect such consumer rights as First Sale and Fair Use. Would you support limiting the DMCA to avoid infringing on consumer rights? What steps would you take to ensure that both content providers and content consumers are provided the rights they deserve?

We’d appreciate it if you’d respond to these questions by sending your answers to me, as the President of the ECA Oklahoma City Chapter, at ezknight.okceca(at)gmail.com. We look forward to receiving your thoughts on these important issues. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Jennifer Mercurio, ECA’s Director of Government Affairs, at jenn(at)theECA.com.