View Full Version : Iran will be attacked in five days...
Grahamr
04-01-2008, 10:28 PM
http://www.rense.com/general75/bite.htm
According to Russian intelligence.
Conejo
04-01-2008, 11:53 PM
why, did they watch The Ring video?
BlackIce, British Commie
04-02-2008, 08:07 AM
I wanted it from The Onion..
I won't believe it until I hear it from the rabid crazy neocon who subscribes to each and every Israeli intelligence bulletin
Tollwutig
04-02-2008, 11:10 AM
Wow someone was accurate last year... article date 3/25/07
3-25-7
WASHINGTON DC -- The long awaited US military attack on Iran is now on track for the first week of April, specifically for 4 AM on April 6, the Good Friday opening of Easter weekend, writes the well-known Russian journalist Andrei Uglanov in the Moscow weekly "Argumenty Nedeli." Uglanov cites Russian military experts close to the Russian General Staff for his account.
You have multiple fail here... Easter was 3/23 this year so how could it happen on Good Friday? Need I point out the 6th of April is a Thursday?
or is this another piss poor April 1 thing?
Grahamr
04-02-2008, 06:24 PM
or is this another piss poor April 1 thing?
Nay.
Maybe if the neocons realize they've been outed by the Ruskies, they will change the date or just drop it. It all depends on how good Russian intelligence is.
MUTANT SPUD
04-02-2008, 08:10 PM
There's that school of thought that supports the theory that the U.S. will attack Iran to head off the prospect of an Israeli strike and the wider conflict which it could cause. I don't think they'll do it though.
i.roll.20s
04-02-2008, 08:40 PM
How do you say "Operation Barbarossa" in Farsi?
Grahamr
04-02-2008, 09:47 PM
There's that school of thought that supports the theory that the U.S. will attack Iran to head off the prospect of an Israeli strike and the wider conflict which it could cause. I don't think they'll do it though.
I don't think that people are worried about the Iranian issue since the natl intel estimate came out, but my worst fear is that the NIE was just made to lower the Iranians into a sence of security. On one hand, they might invade because supposedly Iran was Bush's ultimate goal...But maybe not, because the U.S armed brass has already said they will resign, and the Bush admin might not do anything more to screw their already ailing repuation.
How do you say "Operation Barbarossa" in Farsi?
You should ask my friend in college, he knows Farsi.
kurisu7885
04-02-2008, 10:01 PM
I'll believe it when I see it happen.
i.roll.20s
04-02-2008, 10:21 PM
You should ask my friend in college, he knows Farsi.
I was actually just speaking rhetorically.
MUTANT SPUD
04-02-2008, 11:54 PM
A beheading strike wouldn't work on Iran anyway, it'd just validate their grievances in the eyes of the muslim world. Nuclear weapons are a worry but realistically they haven't directly killed anyone in 63 years. The Rwandan holocaust was carried out with what amounted to hand tools, and as terrorists have proven you don't need a trillion dollar arms industry to make your enemies suffer. If Iran was attacked it'd just ensure another 50 years of strife in the middle east, and increase the threat to our homelands. Additionally the moral high ground, shaky though it may be, would be lost and the alliance would break up, Australia has already said it would not support an attack on Iran, I know our material contributions are tiny but the moral support given to the U.S and British governments by smaller allies goes a long way in the international community.
A beheading strike wouldn't work on Iran anyway, it'd just validate their grievances in the eyes of the muslim world. Nuclear weapons are a worry but realistically they haven't directly killed anyone in 63 years. The Rwandan holocaust was carried out with what amounted to hand tools, and as terrorists have proven you don't need a trillion dollar arms industry to make your enemies suffer. If Iran was attacked it'd just ensure another 50 years of strife in the middle east, and increase the threat to our homelands. Additionally the moral high ground, shaky though it may be, would be lost and the alliance would break up, Australia has already said it would not support an attack on Iran, I know our material contributions are tiny but the moral support given to the U.S and British governments by smaller allies goes a long way in the international community.
yes but why do you hate america
BlackIce, British Commie
04-03-2008, 08:49 AM
yes but why do you hate america
They didn't save his country in WW2.
MUTANT SPUD
04-03-2008, 04:38 PM
They didn't save his country in WW2. I don't hate America, we saved their arses in New Guinea in 1943. Anyway my only problems with the U.S.A are really problems with my own country, people here lack the confidence to go our own way because they worry that America won't like us anymore and then the Indonesians will invade and turn us all into Muslims..seriously that's what some people think. Also Contemporary R&B is a sore point with me:p
I don't hate America, we saved their arses in New Guinea in 1943. Anyway my only problems with the U.S.A are really problems with my own country, people here lack the confidence to go our own way because they worry that America won't like us anymore and then the Indonesians will invade and turn us all into Muslims..seriously that's what some people think. Also Contemporary R&B is a sore point with me:p
Yeah sorry, we are to blame for Indonesia. BUT we did leave at the request of the Americans, soooo
MUTANT SPUD
04-04-2008, 02:07 AM
http://www.bigpond.com/news/national/content/20080404/2208065.asp
Q.E.D..See what I mean, this makes my skin crawl.When (Australian Prime Minister) Kevin Rudd encountered George Bush during the NATO summit he acknowledged him with a small salute. I don't care if he thinks that sort of thing is funny, he's our prime minister,nobody else saluted Bush, at best he was being overly familiar with someone he barely knows. Could you imagine someone like Sarkozy or Chancellor Merkel saluting another leader? There's a time and place for that sort of thing and a NATO summit is neither.
http://www.bigpond.com/news/national/content/20080404/2208065.asp
Q.E.D..See what I mean, this makes my skin crawl. I don't care if he thinks that sort of thing is funny, he's our prime minister,nobody else saluted Bush, at best he was being overly familiar with someone he barely knows. Could you imagine someone like Sarkozy or Chancellor Merkel saluting another leader? There's a time and place for that sort of thing and a NATO summit is neither.
Holy Jesus.
Merkel even almost cried RAEEEP when he tried to give her a backrub. Ruddkipz needs backbone.
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.