PDA

View Full Version : Police probe boy, 10, over 'gay boy' e-mail jibe


Picho
04-02-2007, 03:35 AM
A father criticised a police force today for launching an investigation after his ten-year-old son allegedly called a schoolfriend "gay" in an email.

Company director Alan Rawlinson said he was astounded after two police officers arrived at his home in Bold Heath, Cheshire, to speak to his son George.

The officers were called earlier this month after a parent complained that George had called her son a "gay boy" in an email.

Mr Rawlinson, 41, said: "I could not believe what I was hearing when the officers told me.

"They told me they considered it a very serious offence, I thought they were joking at first.

"I run a construction company and have to deal with problems of theft and the like everyday. My wife is a magistrate and sees serious crimes all the time so this just seemed like a huge waste of resources for something so trivial.

"I am furious about what has happened, it just seems the politically correct brigade are taking over."

Mr Rawlinson said his son, who is a pupil at Farnworth Primary School in Widnes, was terrified when police arrived and asked him if he would be arrested.

He added: "I think the police do a good job but I think their hands are tied by this political correctness.

"My son is not anti anybody, he is too young to have made judgments about people and we have always taught him to judge people as he finds them.

"There is no evidence he sent this email but even if he did I'm sure the words have been taken the wrong way.

"If somebody had called the police about something like this in my day they would have laughed - they certainly wouldn't have sent two officers out. It is completely ridiculous."

Inspector Nick Bailey, of Cheshire Constabulary, said: "The matter was reported to police as the parents of the boy believed it was more sinister than just a schoolyard prank.

"We were obliged to record the matter as a crime and we took a proper, and maybe an old fashioned, view.

"Going to the boy's house was a reasonable course of action to take. We do not feel this is something that should be pursued.

"My understanding is that this message was part of some behaviour that has been ongoing.

"The use of the word gay would imply this is homophobic but we would be hard-pushed to say this is a homophobic crime.

"This boy has not been treated as an offender."

Copyright Press Association 2007



Sorry.

WORDS FOR THE POST TO MAKE LONG AND BE POSTED!

Ministeve
04-02-2007, 04:52 AM
Their time would be better spent playing Counter-Strike.

Thefremen
04-02-2007, 05:10 AM
http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j310/robot_morgan/Faggottree.jpg

nightwng2000
04-02-2007, 09:24 AM
Political Correctness? No.

Cops watch online sites and emails for references to guns, bombs, even violent video game references.

If this had been a case of someone using offensive terms for some other groups (religious, racial, gender, etc), there may very well be an outcry if the bigoted comment were made by "the wrong person", whereas, if made by someone else, it's "political correctness".

The cops did the right thing. A Parent was concerned about something their child received in an email. They reported it. It may not seem like anything now. But Later, if something worse happens, at least there is now an established pattern filed and recorded.

There have been articles on online abuse (bullying) that has continued into chat rooms and email that started in the schools. While daddy-dearest may downplay abuse of this type as "political correctness", we now see a potential problem that can be nipped in the bud early on. Or be a warning sign of future events by this kid as well as how the parent may very well react. He claims to raise his son to not judge people, yet gets behind an apparently bigoted comment made by his son to another student.

Homosexuals have been ostracized for a long time by bigots. It's time the bigots got a bit of it back.

Picho
04-02-2007, 09:35 AM
I still like my threads title though. Its like batman and Robin.

nightwng2000
04-02-2007, 09:37 AM
I still like my threads title though. Its like batman and Robin.

Yeah, "police probe boy" had me a wee bit nervous.

Tollwutig
04-02-2007, 09:55 AM
over-reacting much? kids call each other gay all the time at that age, geesh, parents need to lighten up.

weatherlight
04-02-2007, 09:58 AM
http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j310/robot_morgan/Faggottree.jpg
That tree is not a good faggot tree, you need one thats a bit more bare. Maybe like the tops of these trees.
http://www.lambic.co.uk/jenblog/wp-content/trees.jpg
I personaly like to use tamerack but some tiimes you take what ever faggots you can get as long as they burn.

nightwng2000
04-02-2007, 10:50 AM
over-reacting much? kids call each other gay all the time at that age, geesh, parents need to lighten up.

Kids of one group call each other the "n word" all the time too. And barring a few people who disagree with even that practice, it's uaually acceptable practice. Yet when someone outside that group, using the "n word" in the exact same tone, context, and manner, it becomes an issue of racism, a demand for apologies, and protests.

Tollwutig
04-02-2007, 11:16 AM
Kids of one group call each other the "n word" all the time too. And barring a few people who disagree with even that practice, it's uaually acceptable practice. Yet when someone outside that group, using the "n word" in the exact same tone, context, and manner, it becomes an issue of racism, a demand for apologies, and protests.

being in said group, "gay" is not offensive, nor does calling a kid "gay" a reason to call the police, nor is using nigger for that matter.

KN
04-02-2007, 11:57 AM
I forcefully request an explanation regarding this homosexual foilage.

At once. ;p

Jabrwock
04-02-2007, 01:11 PM
Any particular reason this wasn't brought up with the teacher first, seeing as they are classmates? This could have been resolved with a quick parent-teacher meeting. Why call the cops right away?

nightwng2000
04-02-2007, 01:28 PM
Any particular reason this wasn't brought up with the teacher first, seeing as they are classmates? This could have been resolved with a quick parent-teacher meeting. Why call the cops right away?

One form of counter-argument: It wasn't done on school ground, so the school should be left out of it.

Doesn't matter if it makes commone sense to ask those in the school what has been going on. See all the stings going on on MySpace.

Still, one has to wonder if the school officials are of a "like mind" on the issue. There's nothing that says the kid who sent the email hasn't been verbally abusive (at the least) to his victim in school. Nothing that says he has either. So I would be concerned if this kid has been doing other things in school that the teachers or other authority figures have been allowing.

Jabrwock
04-02-2007, 01:35 PM
One form of counter-argument: It wasn't done on school ground, so the school should be left out of it.An "I don't know how to deal with this" argument if I ever saw one. And not an uncommon one for schools to make.

Counter-counter argument: The school doesn't have to "deal" with it, just provide a venue for the concerned parents to talk to the other parents, with a third party there (the teacher/principal/counselor/whatever) to mediate.

Still, one has to wonder if the school officials are of a "like mind" on the issue. There's nothing that says the kid who sent the email hasn't been verbally abusive (at the least) to his victim in school. Nothing that says he has either. So I would be concerned if this kid has been doing other things in school that the teachers or other authority figures have been allowing.I notice no mention is made of the "victim", just his mother.

Was he concerned and showed it to her, or was she just snooping, and misinterpreted some back-and-forth joshing?

nightwng2000
04-02-2007, 01:44 PM
An "I don't know how to deal with this" argument if I ever saw one. And not an uncommon one for schools to make.

Counter-counter argument: The school doesn't have to "deal" with it, just provide a venue for the concerned parents to talk to the other parents, with a third party there (the teacher/principal/counselor/whatever) to mediate.

I notice no mention is made of the "victim", just his mother.

Was he concerned and showed it to her, or was she just snooping, and misinterpreted some back-and-forth joshing?

Moreover, even if she didn't ask him if he was concerned, one would think that in the process of the investigation, the cops themselves would have asked him.

The head cop said the investigation was done appropriately, but he made no mention of what the kid told investigators, if anything.

ZippyDSMlee
04-02-2007, 01:57 PM
being in said group, "gay" is not offensive, nor does calling a kid "gay" a reason to call the police, nor is using nigger for that matter.

Its sad when all of todays pansy's are not the gay ones....
(meaning the buck up walk it off males are crying foul and whineing to moomy)